EQ 2.0

Digital Ads + Infrastructure Plan

Preparing EQ for a membership-led product, which is data and technology led, and built for scale.

Currently

Where EQ stands today

Based on our introductory call, here's where EQ stands today, and this plan is the machine that takes it to 2.0.

What we found under the hood

Good bones, leaky plumbing

The real blocker

A missing middle, and data that can't see it

The principle we build on

Two engines, one funnel

Paid media

Fills the top

Acquires new people with feeling-led ads. Its job is a steady flow of first visits into the funnel.

Owned media

Converts the middle

Email, on-site and retargeting move people toward packs, programs and membership, at a fraction of the cost.

The funnel we advertise into

One funnel, four stages

Discover
Acquisition
First experience of EQ
Reset
Acceleration
Build the habit (the bridge)
Transformation
Acceleration
Solve a real outcome
Membership
Retention
A way of living

Paid fills the top. Owned moves people down.

How we acquire

Sell the feeling, not the modality

One consolidated cold campaign, not eleven products fighting for the algorithm's attention.

How we convert

Make the click worth it, then make the ask

The booking front end is already a defined scope. It makes every ad dollar convert harder, and it clones for Sydney.

How we nurture

The compounding engine: owned

It's hard to get someone to buy a membership off a cold impression. They're nurtured into it after they've felt the product.

The rollout

Four phases, built backwards from September

The point of the sequencing: generating validation data by mid-August, well inside the raise window.

Phase 1Weeks 0–3 · no new spend

Foundation

Outcome: we can finally retarget, ladder and attribute revenue.

Phase 2Weeks 3–6

Acquisition + the bridge

The question we answer: do first-timers buy a Reset pack when we ask?

Phase 3Weeks 6–12

Acceleration

Phase 4Weeks 12+

Membership-led

The infrastructure

Owned, portable, and built to prove the story

Every piece is an asset you own and carry to Sydney. A Squarespace site and a list trapped inside Momence are not.

The stack · Email

Klaviyo vs Momence vs Mailchimp

Klaviyo Recommend
  • Syncs sales data via API, so we see the revenue each flow and campaign makes, including the EQ 2.0 upsell flows
  • Branching automation for the visit ladder; email + SMS in one place
  • Sync customer information to Meta, allowing us another audience stream into Meta
  • No native Momence link; needs an API bridge (a build)
  • Expensive (5,000 emails = USD $110/month)
Momence current
  • Already holds the data; zero setup
  • Can't attribute revenue to a send
  • Broadcasts only, no lifecycle automation
Mailchimp
  • Native Momence sync; cheaper
  • Also can't attribute flow or campaign revenue
  • Weaker automation and segmentation

Only Klaviyo tells you which email made money. That's the whole point of the upsell flows, and the raise.

Email · where it is today

Current emails

Session promo
Current EQ email — Live Sound in the Bathhouse
Weekly what's-on
Current EQ email — This week at EQ

As sent today via Momence broadcasts. Click an email to expand, or scroll inside the frame.

Email · what we can do in Klaviyo

New emails

Weekly what's-on
New EQ email — How do you want to feel this week?
Post-visit pack offer
New EQ email — 3-Visit Reset offer

Designed to the EQ brand, built as reusable Klaviyo templates. Click an email to expand, or scroll inside the frame.

The stack · Analytics & testing

PostHog vs Microsoft Clarity

PostHog Recommend
  • One platform: funnels, true A/B testing, session replay, heatmaps, feature flags
  • A/B testing to validate offers and pages, which the raise needs and Squarespace / Clarity can't do
  • Self-hostable, and more data to leverage through our Claude integration
  • Needs setup and instrumentation
Microsoft Clarity already running
  • Free heatmaps and session replays, live today
  • Through our Claude integration, only the past 3 days of data is accessible
  • No true A/B testing or funnel analysis

Keep Clarity for free replays now. Add PostHog for the A/B testing and funnel data the raise depends on.

The stack · Booking

Custom front end vs the Momence widget

Custom front end Recommend Momence API
  • EQ-branded browse and select; surfaces packs and gift vouchers as products
  • Fixes the clunky embed, a known drop-off, so paid traffic converts better
  • First-party tracking click-to-booking; home for the qualifier and season calendar; portable to Sydney
  • A build, and payment still hands off to Momence (the API can't do one-off card checkout yet)
Momence widget current
  • Already live; handles payment natively
  • Off-brand and clunky, a known conversion drop-off
  • Can't merchandise packs or vouchers; little control over the experience or tracking
The stack · Website

Custom build vs Squarespace

Custom build Recommend
  • We can build the season calendar, the "how do you want to feel?" qualifier and true A/B testing faster, all of which Squarespace struggles with
  • Faster and better SEO, so lower ad costs and more organic bookings
  • Clean first-party tracking, design freedom for the reposition, and it clones to Sydney
  • Upfront build; needs a developer (we do this for other clients already)
  • Could be more expensive in the long run with upkeep + needing to rely on me to make changes
Squarespace current
  • Already live, cheap, and easy to edit yourself
  • No true A/B testing; fights the calendar and the qualifier
  • Slower, weaker SEO, and doesn't travel to Sydney (rebuild, not clone)
Our recommendations

Our recommendations

The strategy

Three channels, one job each

Currently we have a really good pulse on Meta and Google, but as we know, retention has always been our weak point. We need to make email and retention our strongest asset. With a database the size we have, we're essentially paying these channels to acquire the same customers over and over again.

Meta feeds the top of the funnel with outcome-based creative, leading cold acquisition into discovery products.

Google catches the demand generated from Meta, and usually captures the sale in last-click attribution.

Email nurtures the active database, improving lifetime value and moving people into membership.

Every channel stays in its lane, and helps the others perform better.

The strategy · Meta

Create the demand with Meta

The strategy · Google

Catch the demand we create

The strategy · Email

Where the ladder actually lives

The split

Where the money goes

Acquisition70%
Warm retargeting15%
Testing — programs & membership, warm15%

This will shift as the strategy evolves and we generate more data.

What we measure

Our measurement numbers

AcquisitionCost per new Discover customerGoogle Analytics + ad channels (Meta & Google)
BridgeDiscover → Reset conversionKlaviyo flow analytics
AccelerateReset → ProgramKlaviyo flow analytics
Membership conversionProgram → MembershipKlaviyo flow analytics
ValueCustomer lifetime valueKlaviyo (Momence sales synced; historic + predicted LTV)
OwnedRevenue per Klaviyo flowKlaviyo flow analytics

Everything will be cross-referenced to Google Analytics using UTM codes for a source of truth.

Investment

What it costs, and what it buys

These would all fall outside current paid-media scope, listed here in order of priority. We don't need to nail them all off at once (nor would I have the capacity to), but a longer-term rollout can be discussed.

Where we go from here

Next steps

EQ 2.0 · Digital Ads + Infrastructure Plan · ASAB Digital
1 / 30
← → to navigate · F for fullscreen